Ah, 1994. OJ’s low-speed police chase makes the Ford Bronco famous. Nancy Kerrigan survives Tanya Harding’s hit squad. Thousands of young men start rocking the “Ross Gellar” haircut. Good times.
Good times? Not entirely. Some things are best left behind. Forever.
I came home last night to an email sent by a former colleague of mine. Sometime last year we had landed a client in the beauty pageant business. It was an exciting opportunity to work up designs that were more classy and more fashionable than our ususal fare. My friend and co-worker, Matthew Esparza, kicked off the project by creating a beautiful Latin-flavored logo and the beginnings of a great client identity. By the time I was brought into the project to work up website comps, we had put ourselves into a very open, creative position. The design I ultimately came up with—while it may not be the most beautiful thing you’ve ever seen—was certainly classy, dignified, and a credit to the burgeoning pageant’s credibility. The work was significant enough that I’ve had it in my portfolio for some time now.
So when I read that email last night, you will understand why I cringed, laughed and wanted to cry—all at the same time. As designers, we take time to not only make pretty things but understand why a product should look the way it does.
It’s never pretty when 1994 attacks.
This is what the website used to look like, as I designed it. You will note that one of the main benefits of this design is that it doesn’t make you want to gouge your eyes out with a spork. Nevertheless, someone involved with the pageant decided that classy and professional was kind of overrated and that their cousin’s kid could probably rock out a comparable website instead of an experienced professional.
I’ve experienced the pain of watching a carefully laid-out design be broken and misedited by a third party out of my control. That just comes with the territory, as does this incident. What is most amazing to me is the sheer—well, ugliness—of the work that has replaced my own. It’s not even pride talking, because we all know that no website really lasts forever. Change can be good. I just didn’t think professional organizations actually allowed work like this to represent them. Looks like I was wrong.
Jeremy Boles » 1263 days ago #
Holy Crap.Jeff Smith » 1263 days ago #
Wow. That’s all I can say is wow.M Rodriguez » 1263 days ago #
Apparently they’re based in San Anton, so that says it all right there! Ha ha…Shawn Grimes » 1263 days ago #
Oh good lord. That is such a shame Jared. I can only imagine all the emotions running through your head when you first saw this. What the hell were they thinking!Graham Peel » 1263 days ago #
Ouch. Just Ouch.Todd » 1263 days ago #
I’m so, so, so sorry Jared…dave » 1263 days ago #
let me see if i understand the story…Jeff Wheeler » 1263 days ago #
It seems 1994 is making a comeback. Just two days ago I found http://mt.org (while looking for a Movable Type shortcut).Jared Christensen » 1263 days ago #
Dave – I designed the site last year, and in the recent past it got replaced with that abomination.Graham Bancroft » 1263 days ago #
Jeff, that’s made me feel physically ill.Jared Christensen » 1263 days ago #
Sweet mercy, Jeff. Nice find! I wonder how many other folks have had their retinas burned out whilst searching for MT?Matthew Pennell » 1263 days ago #
I quite like it…Chris Kenworthy » 1263 days ago #
Jared, I saw the new site when I had to deal with their threats to sue me because neither of them can speak english well enough to understand that “Your new host didn’t setup the DNS records properly, I no longer have control of your domain, it’s not my fault your site isn’t showing up”. This is after it took 6 months to get them to pay what they owed me for close to a year. Apparently a “credit card” isn’t something anyone at LatinaCrownUSA has, uses, or even understands.Kyle Jones » 1263 days ago #
Luckily I have no sporks readily available.Russ » 1262 days ago #
I must say, I think these guys are much more advanced than 1994. They must have pulled this from at least 1995 and did their testing in Netscape 2.0 to get those frames!Jordan Moore » 1262 days ago #
I’m sorry—it sucks when that happens.Pieman » 1262 days ago #
daddy, whats a spork?simon » 1262 days ago #
dear Christ, thats bewildering, I dont know…Lisa McMillan » 1262 days ago #
wtf. wTf. Wtf. wtF. WTF!Aaron Christensen » 1261 days ago #
Not being a designer myself, I can still appreciate the sloppy plunge into mediocrity this site has taken. In the words of Homer J Simpson…”SWEET MERCIFUL CRAP!!!”tff4 » 1261 days ago #
Having recently been swayed towards standards based design, I can understand why people still latch onto non-compliant code, corraling images with tables. The strange thing is that you did get paid to make a perfectly good, modern, compliant design and built the actual site and they took it down.You're reading an entry from my Weblogue. My most recent writing is on the Weblogue landing page, and a full listing of all my writing is available in the Archives.
Now That's What I Call Customer Service!